After you’ve met with your partner and recorded the therapeutic video revisit this week, you will complete a two to three-page written analysis of the interaction (excluding the title and APA reference pages).
You should critique (1) your partner as the therapist, and then (2) a brief description of your perspective as the client based on the therapy provided during this video revisit.
For the critique of your partner as therapist, look at the Basic Counseling Skills Rubric (PDF). You will look at the “Basic Counseling Skills Rubric” for examples of what to include and structure your written critique (scoring within your critique is
necessary). Refer directly to the video to support the points within your critique.
Save your time - order a paper!
Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlinesOrder Paper Now
For your brief description of your perspective as the client, what were helpful aspects of the session? What was unhelpful? Describe.
Please refer to the Grading Rubric for details on how this activity will be graded.
After you’ve met with your partner and recorded the therapeutic video revisit this week, you will complete a two to three-page written analysis of the interaction (excluding the title and APA referenc
Psychological Constructivism Guiding Questions What approaches did Piaget & Bruner take to understand learning? What are some strengths and limitations of their perspectives? How do we see this week’s theories implemented in our own ideas about learning and the ways in which learning happens in schools? How have Psychological Constructvist approaches impacted teaching and learning and what is their significance? In what ways do this week’s readings connect with your experiences of teaching and learning? Pre-Reading Before attending to this week’s readings, think about the questions above. Much like you would do a K-W-L Chart with your students; determine what you KNOW about the topic and what you WANT to KNOW about the topic. Your R2R Post will indicate what you LEARNED about this week’s content. Refer to the R2R details and the success criteria outlined in the Syllabus. Readings Phillips & Soltis: Chapters 5 & 6 Schunk: Chapter 6 (The Following Pages/Sections Only) 228-231 234 (Cont & App) – 240 261-263 265 (Instructional Applications) 269 (Stop at Peer Assisted) Video: Interview with Bruner https://youtu.be/xxn6IpAJEz8 Activities Complete Assigned Readings Post R2R#3 (due by Sunday @ 11:59 PM) Begin by replying to this discussion thread and adding your R2R Post. Post a Reflective Response (R2R) Approximately 500 words in length Post should be substantive demonstrating knowledge of the readings Should address the Guiding Questions for the week Success Criteria R2R Posts (approximately 500 words in length) Should § consider key themes and arguments that go across the readings § engage the readings taken as a whole, rather than reviewing each article § bring the week’s readings and your understandings of them to the forefront § build on previous course readings § demonstrate a logical progression of ideas § where appropriate, make connections to your professional practice and/or current educational matters § cite the readings in your response by using proper APA Style format and conventions