Motivation Of Behavior B. F. Skinner built on the classic behavioristic principles to develop his theory on human behavior. His theory has since been expanded and applied in many practical areas. Th

Motivation Of Behavior B. F. Skinner built on the classic behavioristic principles to develop his theory on human behavior. His theory has since been expanded and applied in many practical areas. Th
Discussion of the Modern-Day Applications of Reinforcement Learning in Education 98 points Criteria Description Discussion of the Modern-Day Applications of Reinforcement Learning in Education 5. Excellent 98 points Discussion of the modern-day applications of reinforcement learning in education is clearly presented. Includes a thoughtful, thorough discussion of all required elements. Discussion demonstrates a deep and thorough understanding and insight of human motivation for learning. 4. Good 89.18 points Discussion of the modern-day applications of reinforcement learning in education is clearly presented. Includes a thorough discussion of all required elements. Discussion demonstrates an understanding of human motivation for learning. 3. Satisfactory 80.36 points Discussion of the modern-day applications of reinforcement learning in education is present but cursory and lacks depth. 2. Less than Satisfactory 71.54 points Discussion of the modern-day applications of reinforcement learning in education is present but incomplete. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Discussion of the modern-day applications of reinforcement learning in education is either not present or not evident to the reader. collapse Discussion of the Modern-Day Applications of Reinforcement Learning in Behavior Therapy assessment Discussion of the Modern-Day Applications of Reinforcement Learning in Behavior Therapy 98 points Criteria Description Discussion of the Modern-Day Applications of Reinforcement Learning in Behavior Therapy 5. Excellent 98 points Discussion of the modern-day applications of reinforcement learning in behavior therapy is clearly presented. All required elements are evident and given support from current, scholarly research. Discussion demonstrates a deep and thorough understanding of course material. 4. Good 89.18 points Discussion of the modern-day applications of reinforcement learning in behavior therapy is clearly presented. All required elements are evident and given support from research. Discussion demonstrates an understanding of course material. 3. Satisfactory 80.36 points Discussion of the modern-day applications of reinforcement learning in behavior therapy is present but cursory and lacks depth. 2. Less than Satisfactory 71.54 points Discussion of the modern-day applications of reinforcement learning in behavior therapy is present but incomplete. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Discussion of the modern-day applications of reinforcement learning in behavior therapy is either not present or not evident to the reader. collapse Synthesis and Argument assessment Synthesis and Argument 28 points Criteria Description Synthesis and Argument 5. Excellent 28 points Synthesis of source information is present and scholarly. Argument is clear and convincing presenting a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. 4. Good 25.48 points Synthesis of source information is present and meaningful. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. 3. Satisfactory 22.96 points Synthesis of source information is present, but pedantic. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. 2. Less than Satisfactory 20.44 points Synthesis of source information is attempted, but is not successful. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points No synthesis of source information is evident. Statement of purpose is not followed to a justifiable conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses non-credible sources. collapse Thesis Development and Purpose assessment Thesis Development and Purpose 28 points Criteria Description Thesis Development and Purpose 5. Excellent 28 points Thesis and/or main claim are clear and comprehensive; the essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. 4. Good 25.48 points Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. They are descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. 3. Satisfactory 22.96 points Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. 2. Less than Satisfactory 20.44 points Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. collapse Mechanics of Writing assessment Mechanics of Writing 14 points Criteria Description Mechanics of Writing 5. Excellent 14 points Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. 4. Good 12.74 points Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. 3. Satisfactory 11.48 points Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. 2. Less than Satisfactory 10.22 points Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Mechanical errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. collapse APA Format assessment APA Format 14 points Criteria Description APA Format 5. Excellent 14 points The document is correctly formatted to publication standards. All research presented is scholarly, topic-related, and obtained from highly respected, professional, original sources. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. 4. Good 12.74 points Required format is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. Scholarly research accounts for the majority of sources presented and is topic-related and obtained from reputable professional sources. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. 3. Satisfactory 11.48 points Required correctly format is used, although some minor errors may be present. Scholarly research sources are present and topic-related, but the source and quality of some references is questionable. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. 2. Less than Satisfactory 10.22 points Required format is attempted, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Some included sources are not scholarly research or topic-related. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Required format is rarely followed correctly. An appropriate number of topic-related scholarly research sources and related in-text citations is not present. No reference page is included. No citations are used.