For this milestone, submit a paper identifying the leadership strategies that were employed by the organization described in the case study (found in the Module Resources folder), how they were employed, and any additional strategies that could be employed to reflect flexibility, promote sustainability, foster effective change management, and further organizational goals. Explain how your recommended strategies should be employed. Defend your evaluation and choices. The format should be a Word document, written in APA style and cited appropriately.
This is a 4 page paper.
Headings should be created to reflect the critical elements identified in the rubric.
Save your time - order a paper!
Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlinesOrder Paper Now
Follow the rubric requirements (attached).
Sources must be cited with APA format.
Plagiarism is unacceptable. Must be less than 20% copied from source.
PSY 614 Milestone Two: Leadership Strategies Rubric Milestone Two Assignment: Identify appropriate leadership strategies that have been, or could be, employed by the organization described in the case study to reflect flexibility, promote sustainability, foster effective change management, and further organizational goals. What additional strategies could be employed to reflect flexibility, promote sustainability, foster effective change management, and further organizational goals? Clearly explain how your recommended strategies should be employed. Defend your evaluation and choices. Format: Double-spaced Word document, 12-point Times New Roman font, 1-inch margins, APA format, 3–4 pages in length, not including title page and references. Instructor Feedback: Students can find their feedback in the Grade Center. Critical Elements Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Value Analysis of Leadership Strategies Meets “Proficient” criteria and uses substantial details to reinforce and establish the context (27-30) Analyzes central leadership strategies that have been or could be employed to establish context (24-26) Does not sufficiently identify central leadership strategies that have been or could be employed to establish context (21-23) Does not analyze leadership strategies (0-20) 30 Recommendation of Additional Leadership Strategies Meets “Proficient” criteria and justifies recommendations with specific and relevant evidence (27-30) Recommends appropriate leadership strategies that reflect flexibility, promote sustainability, and foster effective change management (24-26) Does not sufficiently recommend appropriate leadership strategies that reflect flexibility, promote sustainability, and foster effective change management (21-23) Recommendation of additional strategies is not evident (0-20) 30 Organization Applies highly effective pattern of organization around a logical flow (introduction, body, and conclusion) to effectively communicate the leadership strategies (18-20) Applies clear pattern of organization around a logical flow (introduction, body, and conclusion) to effectively communicate the leadership strategies (16-17) Does not sufficiently apply clear pattern of organization around a logical flow (introduction, body, and conclusion) to effectively communicate the leadership strategies (14-15) Organization of ideas is not evident (0-13) 20 Articulation of Response Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, and syntax and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format (18-20) Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax (16-17) Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas (14-15) Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax that prevent understanding of ideas (0-13) 20 Earned Total 100%
Final Project Case Study: Fortuga Artisans, Inc. Fortuga Artisans, Inc. has been a successful home decor manufacturing company for more than 30 years . Foun ded as a small operation in 1981 by Peter Fortuga in Charleston, South Carolina, the company has expanded to include international operations , and now employs more than 600 people in three factories (two in the United States and one in Madrid, Spain). Its corporate office remains in the original location in Charleston and employs another 47 full – and part -time employees. In 2011, Peter Fortuga announced his retirement, and the Board of Directors began a search for his replacement. With Peter’s support, along with strong encouragement from the local community, they hired a prominent interior designer, Doug Jeffers , as CEO. His charismatic personality, work ethic, and attention to detail had earned him tremendous acclaim in the Charleston area; as a result, he was very well -connected in the industry. At only 36 years old, Doug served on the b oard s of sev eral local non -profit organizations dedicated to the arts and was known for his innovative ideas as well as his philanthropic prowess . Single, ambitious, and driven, Doug Jeffers was considered the complete package – poised to take Fortuga Artisans, Inc. t o the next level of success. However, within two years , Doug’s executive assistant resigned, citing her dissatisfaction with his leadership of the company. When Doug received Maryann Bishop’s resignation, he was shocked – he ’d thought she was a permanent fixture at Fortuga. She had been with the company for more than five years and he depended on her. Everyone knew and liked Maryann, and Maryann knew everything about the company. When he called her in to discuss her resignation , he asked why she had not discussed her dissatisfaction with him before. Maryann reminded him of all the times she’d tried to do that, and he had simply brushed her off. She said that he took her for granted. For that matter, she felt he took many people for granted. Maryann noted the increase in employee turnover that the ir Vice President of Finance, Sarah Harris, had mentioned in last month’s staff meeting . She also noted the recent concern voiced by Mike Andrews, VP of Artist Relations, over the decline in new artists being signed to the company. She informed Doug that Fortuga’s artists did not like him – several were not planning to renew their contracts at their next renewal date . Also, she noted that employees did not trust him or his ability to lead the company . His treatment of both contracted artisans and staff employees was degrading. He talked down to them, did not welcome or consider their opinions or ideas, made decisions in a vacuum, ignored company policies, and did not respect anyone’s perso nal time. He was chauvinistic, too – Peter Fortuga had left the company with five vice presidents (Domestic Operations, International Operations, Artist Relations , Marketing, and Finance) , three of whom were female; now, only one female remained. The other two had simply said they were resigning for personal reasons. Doug had not asked questions or paused to consider their reasons, because given his extensive network, he ’d already had replacements in mind – both positions were quickly filled with male execu tives who Doug had worked with successfully in the past. Maryann suspected that the one remaining female VP – the one over finance – was looking for employment elsewhere, but she was not sure. Most everyone who worked with and for Fortuga was becoming in creasingly unmotivated , and many had been talking with a competitor , AmerArt, about other employment opportunities. In fact, Maryann had recently been offered a job with that company – at nearly double her pay and with opportunities for training and advanc ement. She had decided to take the job, despite her years of service and loyalty to Fortuga , and she was looking forward to not receiving Doug’s 24/ 7 phone calls about things she felt could have easily waited until the next business day . Doug was speechless; his confidence in his ability was severely shaken. He asked Maryann if he could talk her into staying, but she told him it was too late for that. She had already accepted AmerArt’s offer, and would not break that contract. Over the ne xt two weeks, Doug met with each of his VP’s individually, as well as several other employees and artists in informal venues, and while he knew many were not being completely honest with him, he could tell that Maryann’s feelings were representative of his staff and others who worked with Fortuga. While the community -at -large loved him, those who worked for him did not , and if he did not make some changes to his leadership style, approach, and strategy soon, Fortuga would not continue to thrive . He needed h elp.