- Perform comparative situation and strategy analyses for the four companies with dominant market share. What are the advantages and disadvantages for each of the industry’s top competitors?
The Movie Exhibition Industry: 2015 -GROUP
Save your time - order a paper!
Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines
Order Paper Now
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGroup – External analysis of trends in the general environment
|
3.0 pts
Exceeds expectations and indicates critical opportunities and threats with potential to affect the success of theater owners.
|
2.0 pts
Analysis fully and accurately identifies the external conditions that influence growth and performance in the film industry.
|
1.0 pts
Analysis identifies the external conditions that influence growth and performance in the film industry.
|
0.0 pts
Analysis fails to identify some of the external conditions that influence growth and performance in the film industry.
|
|
3.0 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGroup – External analysis of competitive forces in the industry environment
|
4.0 pts
Exceeds expectations and weighs the competitive forces to provide a reliable prediction of the intensity of rivalry anticipated in the industry.
|
3.0 pts
Assessment accurately estimates the competitive forces with potential to reduce theater profitability and determines their likely effect on competitive rivalry.
|
2.0 pts
Assessment includes and accurately estimates the competitive forces which have the potential to reduce theater profitability.
|
1.0 pts
Assessment excludes or inaccurately estimates some of the competitive forces which have the potential to reduce theater profitability.
|
|
4.0 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGroup – Competitor analysis of companies with dominant market share
|
3.0 pts
Exceeds expectations and integrates the advantages and disadvantages of each of the competitors’ strategies into the analysis.
|
2.0 pts
Analysis provides a comprehensive and precise overview of the top competitors’ business situations and approaches.
|
1.0 pts
Analysis provides a good overview of the top competitors’ business situations and approaches.
|
0.0 pts
Analysis fails to provide a complete overview of the top competitors’ business situations and approaches.
|
|
3.0 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGroup – Evaluation of revenue sources and major costs associated with theater operations
|
3.0 pts
Exceeds expectations and emphasizes the severe constraints of managing an unprofitable business model.
|
2.0 pts
Financial review presents a thorough and detailed accounting of the industry’s income structure and discusses its impact on the financial performance of exhibitors.
|
1.0 pts
Financial review considers the revenue sources and major costs that impact today’s film exhibitors.
|
0.0 pts
Financial review does not consider all of the revenue sources and/or major costs that impact today’s film exhibitors.
|
|
3.0 pts
|