Review the concepts of informatics as presented in the Resources. Reflect on the role of a nurse leader as a knowledge worker. Consider how knowledge may be informed by data that is collected/acce
Get perfect grades by consistently using www.customizedassignments.com. Place your order and get a quality paper today. Take advantage of our current 20% discount by using the coupon code GET20
Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper
- Review the concepts of informatics as presented in the Resources.
- Reflect on the role of a nurse leader as a knowledge worker.
- Consider how knowledge may be informed by data that is collected/accessed.
The Assignment:
- Explain the concept of a knowledge worker.
- Define and explain nursing informatics and highlight the role of a nurse leader as a knowledge worker.
- Develop a simple infographic to help explain these concepts.NOTE: For guidance on infographics, including how to create one in PowerPoint, see “How to Make an Infographic in PowerPoint” presented in the Resources.
- Your PowerPoint should Include the hypothetical scenario you originally shared in the Discussion Forum. Include your examination of the data that you could use, how the data might be accessed/collected, and what knowledge might be derived from that data. Be sure to incorporate feedback received from your colleagues’ responses.
Excellent Good Fair Poor Develop a 5- to 6-slide PowerPoint presentation that addresses the following:
· Explain the concept of a knowledge worker.· Define and explain nursing informatics and highlight the role of a nurse leader as a knowledge worker. Points Range: 32 (32%) – 35 (35%) The presentation clearly and accurately explains the concept of a knowledge worker.
Save your time - order a paper!
Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines
Order Paper NowThe presentation clearly and accurately defines and explains nursing informatics with a detailed explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker.
Includes: 3 or more peer-reviewed sources and 2 or more course resources. Points Range: 28 (28%) – 31 (31%) The presentation explains the concept of a knowledge worker.
The presentation defines and explains nursing informatics with an explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker.
Includes: 2 peer-reviewed sources and 2 course resources. Points Range: 25 (25%) – 27 (27%) The presentation inaccurately or vaguely explains the concept of a knowledge worker.
The presentation inaccurately or vaguely defines and explains nursing informatics with an inaccurate or vague explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker.
Includes: 1 peer-reviewed sources and 1 course resources. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 24 (24%) The presentation inaccurately and vaguely explains the concept of a knowledge worker or is missing.
The presentation inaccurately and vaguely defines and explains nursing informatics with an inaccurate and vague explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker or is missing.
Includes: 1 or fewer resources. · Develop a simple infographic to help explain these concepts. Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) The presentation provides an accurate and detailed infographic that helps explain the concepts related to the presentation. Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%) The presentation provides an infographic that helps explain the concepts related to the presentation. Points Range: 11 (11%) – 11 (11%) The presentation provides an infographic related to the concepts of the presentation that is inaccurate or vague. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 10 (10%) The infographic provided in the presentation related to the concepts of the presentation is inaccurate and vague, or is missing. · Present the hypothetical scenario you originally shared in the Discussion Forum. Include your examination of the data you could use, how the data might be accessed/collected, and what knowledge might be derived from the data. Be sure to incorporate feedback received from your colleagues’ replies. Points Range: 32 (32%) – 35 (35%) The presentation clearly and thoroughly includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including a detailed and accurate examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data. Points Range: 28 (28%) – 31 (31%) The presentation includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including an accurate examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data. Points Range: 25 (25%) – 27 (27%) The presentation includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including an examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data that is vague or inaccurate. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 24 (24%) The presentation includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including an examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors. Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors. Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) APA format errors. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
Total Points: 100
Review the concepts of informatics as presented in the Resources. Reflect on the role of a nurse leader as a knowledge worker. Consider how knowledge may be informed by data that is collected/acce
Top of Form Nursing informatics is defined by the American Nurses Association as the “specialty that integrates nursing science with multiple information management and analytical sciences to identify, define, manage, and communicate data, information, knowledge, and wisdom in nursing practice” (American Nurses Association, 2015). As technology advances, so does accessibility to resources that can help increase patient care. Nursing informatics allows multiple healthcare providers to easily access real-time data, which in turns increases productivity and more efficient care. Being able to input and access data instantly helps healthcare providers plan and implement orders faster (Laureate Education, 2012e). Wakefield’s article on quality chasm outlines ten rules to help restructure health care. Two rules stood out most to me in regards to this discussion. One is the “shared knowledge and a free flow of information” (Wakefield, 2008, p. 10). This directly ties in with nursing informatics and how patient information is easily accessible to healthcare providers and the patient with up to date. One major ay of collecting data in a psychiatry setting is through communication. I just recently switched from a paper charting facility to a computerized charting using MEDITECH. It’s an old version of technology but it makes data and its analysis easier. For me personally, it was an easy transition and I think it is more proficient. This makes it easier to catch any trends in the decrease of patient status . MEDITECH is harder for the older nurses to utilize and when the system is in downtime, new nurses don’t know how to utilize paper charting too at my old place of work and are completely lost in how to continue administrating medications and carrying out orders. In my facility patient are rounded on every 15 minutes to maintain the safety of the patients. My facility will benefit from a technology called Invisalert which is a proven compliance technology that validates that your patients are being checked. Easy-to-use observation system that immediately improves patient safety. Helps staff efficiently manage their required around-the-clock patient checks. Technology and nursing practices advance together hand in hand. As more knowledge and information is gathered, practices can be improved. However, changes should always be evidence-based, rather than just assuming certain protocols will succeed. References American Nurses Association. (2015). Nursing informatics: Scope & standards of practice (2nd ed.). Silver Springs, MD: Author. Laureate Education (Producer). (2012e). Introduction to nursing informatics. Baltimore, MD: Author. Invisalert Solutions, retrieved from http://www.invisalertsolutions.com/observsmart/ Wakefield, M.K. (2008). The quality chasm series: Implications for nursing. In R.G. Hughes (Ed.), Patient safety and quality: An evidence-based handbook for nurses (Vol. 1, p. 47-66). Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Top of Form Week 1 NURS 6051 discussion response #2 to Semiloore Arekele Colleague Response Hello Semiloore Arekele, Your post caught my attention, considering that we also utilize MEDITECH in our hospital. And you are on point in your opinion that it is more challenging for the older nurses, but during downtime, the new nurses find it difficult to do the paper charting. Ultimately though, electronic charting has brought about positive changes as we spend less time documenting, and the physicians and providers have timely access to vital patient information. The integration of nursing science and technology in nursing informatics is indeed beneficial in the management and communication of data in nursing practice (McGonigle & Mastrian, 2017). The nursing science knowledge that we learned in school is not replaced but only enhanced with technology in our application as we care for our patients. At present, our hospital is training us in the use of iMobile. Again, this is being implemented with the goal of the improvement and timely coordination among the entire healthcare team in the care of our patients. The use of iMobile will bring about a fast escalation of critical results of our patients to nurses, physicians, and providers that have proven to save lives. The enhancement in technology in nursing or nursing informatics has provided us with tools that not only it is convenient for us nurses but has also afforded positive patient outcomes (Laureate Education, 2018). Bottom of Form
