Write a short Critical thinking essay 300-400 words!
Get perfect grades by consistently using www.customizedassignments.com. Place your order and get a quality paper today. Take advantage of our current 20% discount by using the coupon code GET20
Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper
Write a short essay that responds to the following prompt. Original work only, use scholarly sources, follow all instructions.Please refer to rubric
Save your time - order a paper!
Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines
Order Paper NowExplain in your own words the logic of statistical significance and give an example to illustrate your answer (do not simply copy definitions from outside sources. Provide an example of at least a nominal and ordinal variable and an example of a one-tailed and two-tailed test of significance. Response should be 300 – 400 words.
RatingsPts
| 10.0 pts
Exceeds Expectation: Analyzes key elements from 3 or more published sources (text, and three sources – minimum) into a consistent whole. Using multiple (more than 8) words specific to the aspect of the profession of the research topic, the artifact demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the terminology in a CJ course and the weekly research proposal topic. (9 – 10 points) |
8.9 pts
Fully Meets Expectation: Analyzes key elements from 2 or more published sources into a consistent whole. Using multiple (more than 8) words specific to the aspect of the profession of the research topic, the artifact demonstrates a good understanding of the terminology in a CJ course and the weekly research proposal topic (7 – 8.9 pts.) |
6.9 pts
Partially Met Expectations: Analyzes key elements from one or fewer published sources in a partial manner. Uses words specific to the aspect of the profession of the research topic. Artifact demonstrates limited understanding of the terminology in a CJ course and the weekly research proposal topic (6 – 6.9 pts.) |
5.9 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations: Fails to analyzes key elements from all sources (text, and three sources – minimum) into a consistent whole. Fails to use multiple (more than 8) words specific to the aspect of the profession of the research topic, the artifact does not demonstrate an exceptional understanding of the terminology in a CJ course and the weekly research proposal topic. May contain excessive copying of information from outside sources. (0 – 5.9 pts.) |
| 10.0 pts
By discussing multiple (more than 3) key ideas in the unit assignment demonstrates an exceptional understanding of key concepts The reported results are substantive. It is particularly helpful to use specific examples or experiences, properly cited, to illustrate your point. The essay is sufficient or exceeds required length (9 – 10 points) |
8.9 pts
By discussing multiple (2 or3) key ideas in the unit assignment demonstrates an satisfactory understanding of key concepts The reported results are substantive. It is particularly helpful to use specific examples or experiences, properly cited, to illustrate your point. The essay is sufficient required length (7 – 8.9 pts.) |
6.9 pts
By discussing 1 or no key ideas in the unit assignment demonstrates a limited understanding of key concepts The reported results are substantive. It is particularly helpful to use specific examples or experiences, properly cited, to illustrate your point. The essay is not sufficient required length (6 – 6.9 pts.) |
5.9 pts
Does not discuss multiple key ideas in the unit assignment. Does not demonstrate an l understanding of key concepts The reported results are not substantive. It would be particularly helpful to use specific examples or experiences, properly cited, to illustrate your point. The essay is not sufficient required length. (0 – 5.9 pts.) |
| 10.0 pts
The essay reflects careful and thorough proofreading, editing, and formatting. Proper spelling, grammar, punctuation, word choice, sentence construction. The essay contains fewer than 2 errors in the APA writing convention and in the paper presentation (grammar, spelling, etc.) in the paper components (to include): cover sheet, body of term paper, or reference page. 9 – 10 pts. |
8.9 pts
Essay reflects satisfactory proof-reading, editing, and formatting. Proper spelling, grammar, punctuation, word choice, sentence construction. The essay contains fewer than 4 errors in the APA writing convention and in the paper presentation (grammar, spelling, etc.) in the paper components (to include): cover sheet, body of term paper, or reference page. 7 – 8.9 pts. |
6.9 pts
Essay reflects marginal proof-reading, editing, and formatting. Limited proper spelling, grammar, punctuation, word choice, sentence construction. The essay contains more than 5 errors in the APA writing convention and in the paper presentation (grammar, spelling, etc.) in the paper components (to include): cover sheet, body of term paper, or reference page. 6 – 6.9 pts. |
5.9 pts
Essay reflects unsatisfactory proof-reading, editing, and formatting. Limited proper spelling, grammar, punctuation, word choice, sentence construction. The essay contains more than 8 errors in the APA writing convention and in the paper presentation (grammar, spelling, etc.) in the paper components (to include): cover sheet, body of term paper, or reference page. 0 – 5.9 |
